Saturday, September 29, 2007

Compare & Contrtrast between Winston Churchill and Zhou Enlai

(Revised )
Good emotional intelligence (EQ) enables leaders to promote their policies and communicate well with other people. The term EQ refers to “The ability to monitor one’s own and other’s feeling, to discriminate them and to use this information to guide one’s thinking and actions”(P. Salovey & J. Mayer), which includes areas such as interpersonal skills, mood management, impulse control, self-awareness and self-motivation. Prime Minister Winston Churchill of Britain and Zhou Enlai of the People’s Republic of China were both experts at interpersonal skills. However, the ways each one of them demonstrated the skills were different, affected by their countries’ political conditions. Winston Churchill was accomplished in persuasion skills by the use of language so that people could be easily involved in his speech and influenced by his mood. During Second World War, he made a very famous speech entitled “Blood, Sweat and Tears” after forming a new administration for the Great Britain. The speech adopted parallel sentence structure and rhetorical questions which worked well at inspiring people with courage to fight against the invaders. It ended successfully with all the audience members shouting out the slogan: “Come then, let us go forward together with our united strength”. Similar to Churchill, Zhou Enlai was good at interpersonal skills. He presented China’s policies to the world while using language creatively. However, different from Churchill, he was active in the period when China was newly founded and in the toughest time. Thus, he met many provocative questions from foreign reporters. For example, once a reporter triggered words to him: “Do you have prostitutes in China?” He replied: “Yes, we do, in Taiwan.” His answer shot four birds with only one stone. Basically, it was to answer the question. Next, it announced China’s policy of Taiwan dominion. Thirdly, it was protecting his country from insult. Lastly, it was so polite that the reporter didn’t lose face. In conclusion, good EQ is crucial for leaders since it can help them perfect the qualities needed to be successful leaders.

6 comments:

Brad Blackstone said...

Thanks, Jenny, for posting this fine paragraph!

Don't you think it will be easy, and interesting, to write an essay on this?

Z said...

Haha, nice comparison between the two GREAT men. btw, would you mind if i borrowed the definition of EQ from you?since i'm also working on a compare & contrast essay and unfortunately, i still lack a proper definition of EQ.

vincent said...

It is a great challenge to estimate great men like Zhou Enlai.
However, I think you managed to do it well. But I think there are some little problems about your examples about the two great men. I do not refer to the examples you choose, but the way you present them. I think you need to do some improvement work to make it more persuasive

Jacqueline said...

Haha~ZhouEnlai is my idol!!!
Good comparison you have made.
And, smooth and fluent language has been used in your work.
However, some improvements can be made by prsenting your comparation with more "strength".
GO ON!

Jack Lim Wei Li said...

i think it was a good paragraph in the sense that many direct and straight forward comparison have been used in the passage. However,do take note of the sentence structure,its faulty at times,at least from my point of view, e.g. "However, the ways each one of them demonstrated the skills were different..." In this sentence,the 'each one of them' is hanged in the middle of nowhere and made the sentence to be faulty. Considering changing it into 1. "However,each one of them demonstrated the skills in different ways..." OR "However,different ways were demonstrated by each one of them...", will it be better?do you agree with what i see? anyway,great effort by you,keep it on!!!

Bonnie said...

nice comparison~ I am also doing the comparison between two great leader~ i learnt a lot from this article!~